Tag Archives: Hamas

If we bomb them, do they not bleed?

A dear friend from my first long spell in Israel-Palestine in 1978-79, now a rabbi in the US, wrote on her Facebook page a few days ago that Rabbi Hillel’s famous saying had been in her head for days, but she no longer knows who she is. I’m not quite sure what she meant, but in the past week I’ve understood something more of Hillel’s brilliant encapsulation of ethics. I learned how easy it is to lose yourself in your own pain, individual and collective. I learned how difficult but necessary it is to sustain that productive tension between caring for oneself and for others. I struggled to hold on to my moral compass, sometimes losing sight of myself in the swirls of emotional and moral outrage.

The brutal of atrocity of Hamas’s attack on Israeli civilians shocked me by its scale and suddenness. It provoked profound anger in me that I understood grew from an equally deep fear. I was able to avert a visceral urge for vengeance only by contemplating the unbearable cost that exacting revenge would take from my own flesh and blood, the potential perpetrators of revenge. For the first time in decades, I went to a synagogue service not for a special occasion, just to spend time with other Jews and have a chance to talk about what we’re going through. The community was shrouded in sadness, grief and fear, appalled by the massacres, grieving for the dead, in anguish about the hostages, among whom is a friend of the rabbi’s daughter. They were worried about antisemitism, needy for each others’ company and support. The rabbi did a wonderful job of reminding us that the shabbat eve service is a beautiful spiritual exercise to calm the soul (or psyche) and focus on the simple joys of togetherness, the sweetness of the challah bread and kiddush wine. The beauty of Creation and being alive in it as a community.

During the week I had posted to Facebook that.

“I couldn’t bring myself to join in the protest organised by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, even though it has never been more urgent and vital to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians … For the most part, I can join in the chant of ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ as a call to end occupation and apartheid, for Palestinian independence. But I cannot shout it when I think that even one other person also shouting it sees a way to freedom through the brutal massacre of civilians.”

A friend from Extinction Rebellion reassured me that there had been no hint of glorifying Hamas at the Nottingham event (where I live). I had heard from colleagues in Na’amod, the Jewish anti-Occupation movement which I’m active in, that they’d been shocked to hear support for Hamas’ “acts of resistance” from people they assumed to be allies. I was feeling too fragile to face that. In the wake of the mass killings by Hamas I sank into the grief and pain of my community, relatively inured to the pain of others.

The pain of others, of Palestinians in Gaza and the other Occupied Territories, was all to obvious. Every hour the violence takes on the more familiar pattern of previous Israeli wars on Gaza. 2008-9, 2012 (which I experienced up close), 2014, 2021, but on a bigger scale. In the news cycle, pictures flow of bomb explosions, rocket trails, the rubble of destroyed homes being excavated by hand in the search for survivors and bodies to bury. Some of the pictures, those from al-Ahli Hospital blast, are too horrendous to watch closely. The usual mutual recriminations fly, making no difference to the deaths and injuries suffered. As I write the death toll in Gaza is above 4,000 including 1,756 children and 967 women, surely an atrocity in itself. The intensification of the blockade by Israel as the bombing continues further worsens the already desperate humanitarian conditions.

True, unlike in the past episodes the pictures from the Israeli side are different, a train of funerals, distraught families of hostages, harrowing accounts by survivors of the Hamas attacks. I am still “for myself,” more easily moved by video of an Israeli family in mourning than a Palestinian one. Among the many news articles I read over the week one that most moved me was by Amir Tibon who took part in the meeting between Joe Biden and survivors from the kibbutzim and towns around Gaza, not as a journalist but as a resident. Biden both literally and metaphorically gave the survivors a hug. He had felt their pain and connected to it by sharing the pain of his own bereavement. He was for himself, but also for others, for us, Jews and Israelis. We are not alone when the President of the USA gives us a hug. Of course, he gave Israel much more than that, notably the material means to bombard the same Palestinian civilians for whom he also expressed sympathy, as if one hand did not know what the other is doing.

President Biden hugging Rachel Edri. Photo: Brendan Smialowski – AFP.

When we are for ourselves we need others to acknowledge our pain. We need others, like Joe Biden, as well as others in our own community. When we call out “Feel our pain!” we need someone other to hear us. We want them to acknowledge that this Jewish suffering feels to us like all the other Jewish suffering. But the demonstration of sharing one’s pain with others in order to validate and acknowledge their pain works both ways. The very basis of ethics is this relationship with an other. At first, it feels as if acknowledging the pain of others somehow undermines your own pain. But the cost of having your own pain acknowledged is to acknowledge the pain of others.

What and who am I if I am not also moved by a Palestinian woman telling an interviewer that 16 members of her family across three generations were killed when the family home was bombed? Then multiply that family’s loss by about 260. Is that not also an atrocity that cannot be justified by Hamas’ atrocity? Another news report that also moved me last week, but to anger, was about one of those regular acts of brutality to Palestinians in Wadi al-Sik in the West Bank by Israeli soldier-settlers that approached the cruelty of Abu Ghraib. While the incident is overshadowed by the inhumanity of Hamas’ acts, are we that sure we did not also commit atrocities on Palestinians not so long ago, not only at Deir Yassin but also Saliha, Lydda, Abu Shusha, Al-Dawayima, Tantura and elsewhere? Did we ever condemn those massacres at the time of the Nakba the way Palestinians are told by TV interviewers they must condemn what Hamas did? If Hamas terror triggers our trauma of the Holocaust, can we not understand that ordering Palestinians to leave the north of Gaza triggers their trauma of the Nakba? If our pain is acknowledged by others do we not also see how others see us and the pain we have caused them?

What comes to my mind is the famous scene in Avanti Popolo, Rafi Bukai’s 1986 film set at the end of the 1967 war, in which Israeli-Palestinian actor Salim Dau plays an Egyptian soldier, Khaled, who is also an actor. He and another Egyptian soldier are found wandering unarmed and waterless in the Sinai desert by some Israeli soldiers after the cease fire. Dau performs Shylock’s speech from the otherwise antisemitic play by Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice in English, 51 minutes into the film.

I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs,
dimensions, senses, affections, passions; fed with
the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject
to the same diseases, heal’d by the same means,
warm’d and cool’d by the same winter and summer
as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us,
do we not die?

The Israelis give them water and reluctantly allow them to tag along. In the subsequent scene the Israeli and Egyptian soldiers march and sing along to the Italian socialist anthem Avanti Popolo which is playing on a transistor radio. The film ends badly for the Israeli soldiers who sneak away from the Egyptians and walk into a minefield and both Egyptians who are shot in the ensuing melee on the banks of the Suez Canal. But there is a moment of shared humanity, mixed up roles as the Palestinian as Jew (playing an Egyptian) beseeches the Israelis to satisfy a basic need, to acknowledge the shared vulnerability of human bodies in a harsh natural and political environment. Shylock’s speech is about seeking revenge for the wrong done to him, just as a Christian would, but Dau stops before that turn. So should we.

Perhaps the hardest bit is not that, acknowledging the pain of others, some of which we are responsible for both then and now, but that we have to take that step now. As Noam Shuster, writing “for those who have the capacity to mourn for two peoples” put it:

“Both peoples are retreating inward right now, and it is extremely difficult for those of us who are trying to hold the pain of everybody grieving. Our mental, emotional, and political space is shrinking all at once.”

I can certainly understand that it is too soon for many to acknowledge the pain of others as the same pain they are feeling. I am far from the place where the grief is being felt directly and have not been bereaved or had anyone I know abducted. So, don’t listen to me, listen to Neta Heiman from Women Wage Peace whose mother Ditza was abducted by Hamas from kibbutz Nir Oz who calls to the Israeli government: “Do not destroy the Gaza strip; that won’t help anyone and will only bring an even more ferocious round of violence the next time.” Listen to Noy Katzman, who at the funeral of their peace-activist brother Hayim, murdered by Hamas, proclaimed: “Do not use our death and our pain to bring the death and pain of other people and other families.” Listen to Ziv Stahl who was visiting her family on kibbutz Kfar Azza on that awful morning who says:

I have no need of revenge, nothing will return those who are gone …all the military might on earth will not provide defense and security. A political solution is the only pragmatic thing that is possible – we are obligated to try, and we must begin this work today.

What is needed now is to acknowledge the immense pain and loss that has been suffered by Palestinians as well as Israelis. What is needed know is to acknowledge that Palestinians bleed as do Jews when pricked by bullets and bombs. What is needed now is a ceasefire, release of the hostages and massive humanitarian aid. Because if not now, when?

It won’t stop until we talk

Parents' Circle slogan

Parents’ Circle slogan

Yesterday came the awful news of the breakdown of the 72 hour humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza war known as Operation Protective Edge, and that an Israeli soldier (Hadar Goldin) was missing, perhaps abducted by Hamas, perhaps already dead. It seemed that there would be no end to the Israeli ground operation and continued attack on built-up areas in Gaza, with the terrible toll in Palestinian civilian casualties as well as the losses of Israel and Palestinian fighters. Today (August 2, 2014) it seems that there is some relief. As I write, the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Security Minister Ya’alon are completing a press conference in which they confirm earlier reports during the day that Israeli forces are withdrawing from built up areas in northern Gaza and that all the known tunnels crossing from Gaza into Israel will be destroyed within hours. The Israeli government is scaling back the war in Gaza unilaterally, rather than trying to arrange another ceasefire with Hamas and beginning negotiations for a longer term agreement through Egyptian (and other) mediation. They will rely on deterrence, the cost of the war for Hamas and Gaza, instead of coming to an arrangement to end the military violence. At the same time, they said that the Israeli government would continue to do whatever it takes to achieve “quiet” and security for Israeli citizens.

But it isn’t over. It’s not over not only for the reasons that the Israeli government gave, namely that the air bombardment or fighting on the ground would resume if it turns out that Hamas are not already deterred. Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri had already declared that Hamas won’t be bound by any Israeli unilateral measure: “They either stay in Gaza and pay the price, unilaterally retreat and pay, or negotiate and pay.” Probably, the Israeli government’s latest move has left the cards in the hands of Hamas, who can choose to drag Israeli forces back into full-scale war as they wish.

It’s not over not because nothing has changed. More than 1600 Palestinians have been killed, along with 66 Israelis, and thousands of homes and other buildings in Gaza have been destroyed. The death and destruction has been colossal and dreadful.

It’s not over because we didn’t talk. It’s not over because the underlying issues that led to the violence have not been addressed. It’s not over because there is still an occupation; there is still a siege on Gaza; there are still Israeli settlements throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territories; there is still one law for Israelis and another for Palestinians in Area C; there is still a separation barrier running through Palestinian land; there are still checkpoints restricting Palestinian movement; there are still Palestinian refugees. It’s not over because Hamas and Islamic Jihad use murderous military violence rather than nonviolent means to bring the Palestinians an independent state. It’s not over for all the reasons that a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority has not been reached yet.

At the root of all those reasons is the refusal to talk. To really talk. To speak and to listen. To hear what is painful and to say what you fear to say. To talk not only to those with whom one feels comfortable, but with those whom you don’t trust and don’t like. To talk to your enemies. There are many reasons why Israel’s government and its citizens distrust Hamas and also the Palestinian Authority, and why talking with them will be difficult, painful, infuriating. And vice versa.

It’s not over in part because the Israeli government has decided that as a matter of policy it will not talk. It will not talk, except by the most indirect means to Hamas at all, and it will not talk in good faith – really talk – to the Palestinian Authority. It will not talk about peace agreements other than as a way to keep talking but not talk at all. And it won’t talk to a Palestinian reconciliation government that includes Hamas. It won’t talk to Hamas other than through the coercive, violent language of Operation Brother’s Keeper and Operation Protective Edge. Hamas talks back with rockets and tunnel attacks. Helluva way to talk.

PCFC.logoIn the midst of the horrific, terrible violence there has been a quiet voice, a voice that talks, that really talks, because it also listens, because it talks for the sake of talking. Not empty talking, but talking for the sake of reconciliation, for the sake of practicing peace long before the politicians get around to talking earnestly about peace. The voice, and the ear, is the Parents Circle Families Forum whose slogan is “It won’t stop until we talk.” During this war, the group of bereaved Israeli and Palestinian families has made efforts, such as this video on social media, to keep talking, to turn people away from the violence that breeds bereavement, and to turn them towards the talk that also listens in their “Peace Tent.”  The tent has operated daily throughout the war, in Tel Aviv’s Cinematheque square, offering a space in their words, “to provide an alternative to the propaganda and hatred running rampant in Israel …. [and]  share their stories, their choice for reconciliation.” It’s not over yet, because not enough people are listening.