Tag Archives: Joe Biden

It’s 1933. Some of us will survive.

It’s 1933. Some of us will survive. In the German elections in March 1933 the democratic system of the Weimar Republic created a parliamentary majority for the Nazi Party’s coalition headed by Hitler. In the 2024 US elections the democratic system has selected a president with, at least, fascist tendencies and given his political party a majority in the Senate and quite likely also the House of Representatives.

This piece is neither a prediction of what Trump will do in power nor an analysis of how he won the elections. It is an attempt to turn the deep pit of dread, fear and foreboding in my stomach into the hope contained in the acknowledgement that however bad it will be – and it will be bad – some of us will survive.

Ursula and Daisy after the wat. Still from BBC A House through Time Series 5, Episode 4.

By chance, my partner and I had just finished watching Series 5: Two Cities at War of the BBC history series A House through Time presented by David Olusoga. Following the stories of the residents of two apartment buildings in London and Berlin from the 1920s to the end of the Second World War, we watch German tanks rolling first into Poland and then France, the bombing Blitz of London and then the Allies’ bombing of Berlin. Of the Jewish families in Berlin, one – parents with a two year-old daughter – escapes only as far as Belgium. The records show the parents being transported to Auschwitz, where the father perished but the mother survived the Death March from there to Ravensbrück. Having witnessed the brutalities of war and being reminded that the fate of the Jewish families is interwoven with the Holocaust, the viewer is left willing for a happy ending for them in the archives. And there is one – a record of mother Ursula and daughter Daisy (who had been placed in hiding by her mother) living together in Brussels, a photo of them after the war and another of them at Daisy’s daughter’s wedding. That is all I needed for the last episode to be bearable – that Ursula and Daisy survived, that they went on to thrive.

Today’s democratically chosen tyrant may be not end up being as responsible for as much human suffering as Hitler. But as Moira Donegan wrote the morning after his election, “For those of us aware of what Trump is capable of, this morning has plunged us into a cold kind of anticipatory grief.” Mass deportations, vast cuts to welfare and health services and “the persecution of dissidents and violent suppression of Trump’s political enemies.”

Trump’s election makes individual and collective survival for millions of Palestinians, especially those in Gaza, an even more acute issue than it has been for decades and since the murderous attacks by Hamas on October 7th 2023. Israel’s vengeful response has already killed as many Palestinians as the German Blitz on Britain, more than 43,000. Its current phase in the north of Gaza that began on October 5th 2024 threatens the lives of some 400,000 people who remain in the area, unwilling or unable to be driven out to the south. A combination of military fire power, from bombs to sniper bullets, starvation, wrecking buildings, and destruction of the last vestiges of a health system, are, writes Idan Landau, “an embodiment of the spirit of ethnic cleansing and resettlement from day one,” paving the way for new Israeli settlements. The pre-US election period was already providing the government and military with a window of opportunity to pursue this particularly vicious operation, but “If Trump wins, the Israeli leadership can breathe a sigh of relief. He will not stop any Israeli plan, however brutal.” Indeed, Netanyahu was quick to congratulate Trump who is an ally of the settler movement, at ease with annexation of Occupied Territories. Thus far US exhortation to Israel to minimise civilian casualties and allow humanitarian relief has had no teeth. Trump will not even encourage such restraint, nor (as did Biden) will he remind the Israeli government of its own duty to protect its citizens held hostage in Gaza for 401 days (as I write this).

A Palestinian girl cries as the Israeli army forcibly moves civilians from the outskirts of the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza on Tuesday.Mahmoud Sleem / Anadolu via Getty Images

Yet however awful the outcome of the latest Israeli onslaught on Gaza, just as some Palestinians survived the 1948 Nakba and remained tsumud, steadfast on their land, some will survive. Palestinians have survived in Gaza since the blockade began after Hamas took over in 2007 and survived the series of Israeli armed assaults since then, as told in a profound anthology I am currently reading, Daybreak in Gaza: Stories of Palestinian Lives and Culture. Some will survive and then thrive this time as before. And even if the Israeli government abandons the hostages in Gaza to their horrible fate, some were released last November and have survived, and the grieving families of those who perish will survive.

The biggest threat to survival that Trump’s election poses is to the natural environment that sustains humankind. According to The Guardian:

Trump’s agendaanalysts have found, risks adding several billion tonnes of extra heat-trapping gases to the atmosphere, further imperiling goals to stave off disastrous global heating that governments are already failing to meet

As I’m active in Extinction Rebellion I might be expected to believe that the climate and ecological crisis is an existential threat to whole human species. But I believe that global heating and nature loss will destroy human civilisation, leaving a few of us to survive in lives that are for many generations nasty, poor, brutish and short. But some of will survive well enough to build new societies in which some of us can thrive.

Artist Joseph Anton Koch (1768–1839)

That narrative arc, from impending doom, to catastrophe, through to survival and thriving, which Ursula and Daisy lived through, is grounds for hope. The catastrophe is not averted, many are lost, but something rises from the ashes. Survival cannot bring back all that was lost in the catastrophe, but it is a partial redemption, like the dove that returns with an olive branch to Noah’s ark after the flood. God promises there were never be another flood and commands Noah’s family – all that is left of humanity – to be fruitful and multiply, signifying the covenant with a rainbow. A passage by Rebecca Solnit has been circulated a lot in the days since Trumpism triumphed at the polls, in which she writes :

The fact that we cannot save everything does not mean we cannot save anything and everything we can save is worth saving… A lot of us are going to come under direct attack, and a lot of us are going to resist by building solidarity and sanctuary… People kept the faith in the dictatorships of South America in the 1970s and 1980s, in the East Bloc countries and the USSR… There is no alternative to persevering, and that does not require you to feel good.

We are not passive spectators in the narrative arc from catastrophe to survival. Noah had to be righteous and build an ark. Ursula’s mother had to find solidarity with the good souls who risked their lives by giving sanctuary to Daisy. Hope is a verb, not a passive state of waiting for better times. As Kamala Harris put it in her concession speech:

Don’t ever give up… do not despair. This is not a time to throw up our hands. This is a time to roll up our sleeves. This is a time to organize, to mobilize and to stay engaged for the sake of freedom and justice and the future that we all know we can build together.

Joe Biden offered similar active hope in his address to the nation:

Setbacks are unavoidable, but giving up is unforgivable… A defeat does not mean we are defeated. We lost this battle… We’re going to be OK, but we need to stay engaged. We need to keep going. And above all: we need to keep the faith.

Perhaps those are the clichéd remarks of politicians, but in these dark days I am receptive to those clichés. Even if today I cannot see the rainbow after the flood, survival after catastrophe, I know the narrative arc was fulfilled before and will be again. Trumpism is not forever. Some of us will survive.

If we bomb them, do they not bleed?

A dear friend from my first long spell in Israel-Palestine in 1978-79, now a rabbi in the US, wrote on her Facebook page a few days ago that Rabbi Hillel’s famous saying had been in her head for days, but she no longer knows who she is. I’m not quite sure what she meant, but in the past week I’ve understood something more of Hillel’s brilliant encapsulation of ethics. I learned how easy it is to lose yourself in your own pain, individual and collective. I learned how difficult but necessary it is to sustain that productive tension between caring for oneself and for others. I struggled to hold on to my moral compass, sometimes losing sight of myself in the swirls of emotional and moral outrage.

The brutal of atrocity of Hamas’s attack on Israeli civilians shocked me by its scale and suddenness. It provoked profound anger in me that I understood grew from an equally deep fear. I was able to avert a visceral urge for vengeance only by contemplating the unbearable cost that exacting revenge would take from my own flesh and blood, the potential perpetrators of revenge. For the first time in decades, I went to a synagogue service not for a special occasion, just to spend time with other Jews and have a chance to talk about what we’re going through. The community was shrouded in sadness, grief and fear, appalled by the massacres, grieving for the dead, in anguish about the hostages, among whom is a friend of the rabbi’s daughter. They were worried about antisemitism, needy for each others’ company and support. The rabbi did a wonderful job of reminding us that the shabbat eve service is a beautiful spiritual exercise to calm the soul (or psyche) and focus on the simple joys of togetherness, the sweetness of the challah bread and kiddush wine. The beauty of Creation and being alive in it as a community.

During the week I had posted to Facebook that.

“I couldn’t bring myself to join in the protest organised by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, even though it has never been more urgent and vital to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians … For the most part, I can join in the chant of ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ as a call to end occupation and apartheid, for Palestinian independence. But I cannot shout it when I think that even one other person also shouting it sees a way to freedom through the brutal massacre of civilians.”

A friend from Extinction Rebellion reassured me that there had been no hint of glorifying Hamas at the Nottingham event (where I live). I had heard from colleagues in Na’amod, the Jewish anti-Occupation movement which I’m active in, that they’d been shocked to hear support for Hamas’ “acts of resistance” from people they assumed to be allies. I was feeling too fragile to face that. In the wake of the mass killings by Hamas I sank into the grief and pain of my community, relatively inured to the pain of others.

The pain of others, of Palestinians in Gaza and the other Occupied Territories, was all to obvious. Every hour the violence takes on the more familiar pattern of previous Israeli wars on Gaza. 2008-9, 2012 (which I experienced up close), 2014, 2021, but on a bigger scale. In the news cycle, pictures flow of bomb explosions, rocket trails, the rubble of destroyed homes being excavated by hand in the search for survivors and bodies to bury. Some of the pictures, those from al-Ahli Hospital blast, are too horrendous to watch closely. The usual mutual recriminations fly, making no difference to the deaths and injuries suffered. As I write the death toll in Gaza is above 4,000 including 1,756 children and 967 women, surely an atrocity in itself. The intensification of the blockade by Israel as the bombing continues further worsens the already desperate humanitarian conditions.

True, unlike in the past episodes the pictures from the Israeli side are different, a train of funerals, distraught families of hostages, harrowing accounts by survivors of the Hamas attacks. I am still “for myself,” more easily moved by video of an Israeli family in mourning than a Palestinian one. Among the many news articles I read over the week one that most moved me was by Amir Tibon who took part in the meeting between Joe Biden and survivors from the kibbutzim and towns around Gaza, not as a journalist but as a resident. Biden both literally and metaphorically gave the survivors a hug. He had felt their pain and connected to it by sharing the pain of his own bereavement. He was for himself, but also for others, for us, Jews and Israelis. We are not alone when the President of the USA gives us a hug. Of course, he gave Israel much more than that, notably the material means to bombard the same Palestinian civilians for whom he also expressed sympathy, as if one hand did not know what the other is doing.

President Biden hugging Rachel Edri. Photo: Brendan Smialowski – AFP.

When we are for ourselves we need others to acknowledge our pain. We need others, like Joe Biden, as well as others in our own community. When we call out “Feel our pain!” we need someone other to hear us. We want them to acknowledge that this Jewish suffering feels to us like all the other Jewish suffering. But the demonstration of sharing one’s pain with others in order to validate and acknowledge their pain works both ways. The very basis of ethics is this relationship with an other. At first, it feels as if acknowledging the pain of others somehow undermines your own pain. But the cost of having your own pain acknowledged is to acknowledge the pain of others.

What and who am I if I am not also moved by a Palestinian woman telling an interviewer that 16 members of her family across three generations were killed when the family home was bombed? Then multiply that family’s loss by about 260. Is that not also an atrocity that cannot be justified by Hamas’ atrocity? Another news report that also moved me last week, but to anger, was about one of those regular acts of brutality to Palestinians in Wadi al-Sik in the West Bank by Israeli soldier-settlers that approached the cruelty of Abu Ghraib. While the incident is overshadowed by the inhumanity of Hamas’ acts, are we that sure we did not also commit atrocities on Palestinians not so long ago, not only at Deir Yassin but also Saliha, Lydda, Abu Shusha, Al-Dawayima, Tantura and elsewhere? Did we ever condemn those massacres at the time of the Nakba the way Palestinians are told by TV interviewers they must condemn what Hamas did? If Hamas terror triggers our trauma of the Holocaust, can we not understand that ordering Palestinians to leave the north of Gaza triggers their trauma of the Nakba? If our pain is acknowledged by others do we not also see how others see us and the pain we have caused them?

What comes to my mind is the famous scene in Avanti Popolo, Rafi Bukai’s 1986 film set at the end of the 1967 war, in which Israeli-Palestinian actor Salim Dau plays an Egyptian soldier, Khaled, who is also an actor. He and another Egyptian soldier are found wandering unarmed and waterless in the Sinai desert by some Israeli soldiers after the cease fire. Dau performs Shylock’s speech from the otherwise antisemitic play by Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice in English, 51 minutes into the film.

I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs,
dimensions, senses, affections, passions; fed with
the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject
to the same diseases, heal’d by the same means,
warm’d and cool’d by the same winter and summer
as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us,
do we not die?

The Israelis give them water and reluctantly allow them to tag along. In the subsequent scene the Israeli and Egyptian soldiers march and sing along to the Italian socialist anthem Avanti Popolo which is playing on a transistor radio. The film ends badly for the Israeli soldiers who sneak away from the Egyptians and walk into a minefield and both Egyptians who are shot in the ensuing melee on the banks of the Suez Canal. But there is a moment of shared humanity, mixed up roles as the Palestinian as Jew (playing an Egyptian) beseeches the Israelis to satisfy a basic need, to acknowledge the shared vulnerability of human bodies in a harsh natural and political environment. Shylock’s speech is about seeking revenge for the wrong done to him, just as a Christian would, but Dau stops before that turn. So should we.

Perhaps the hardest bit is not that, acknowledging the pain of others, some of which we are responsible for both then and now, but that we have to take that step now. As Noam Shuster, writing “for those who have the capacity to mourn for two peoples” put it:

“Both peoples are retreating inward right now, and it is extremely difficult for those of us who are trying to hold the pain of everybody grieving. Our mental, emotional, and political space is shrinking all at once.”

I can certainly understand that it is too soon for many to acknowledge the pain of others as the same pain they are feeling. I am far from the place where the grief is being felt directly and have not been bereaved or had anyone I know abducted. So, don’t listen to me, listen to Neta Heiman from Women Wage Peace whose mother Ditza was abducted by Hamas from kibbutz Nir Oz who calls to the Israeli government: “Do not destroy the Gaza strip; that won’t help anyone and will only bring an even more ferocious round of violence the next time.” Listen to Noy Katzman, who at the funeral of their peace-activist brother Hayim, murdered by Hamas, proclaimed: “Do not use our death and our pain to bring the death and pain of other people and other families.” Listen to Ziv Stahl who was visiting her family on kibbutz Kfar Azza on that awful morning who says:

I have no need of revenge, nothing will return those who are gone …all the military might on earth will not provide defense and security. A political solution is the only pragmatic thing that is possible – we are obligated to try, and we must begin this work today.

What is needed now is to acknowledge the immense pain and loss that has been suffered by Palestinians as well as Israelis. What is needed know is to acknowledge that Palestinians bleed as do Jews when pricked by bullets and bombs. What is needed now is a ceasefire, release of the hostages and massive humanitarian aid. Because if not now, when?