Category Archives: anti-war

Are we safer, now that Huda Al-Sosi is dead?

Are we, Israeli and Diaspora Jews, safer now that Huda Al-Sosi is dead? Do we sleep more easily, feel more secure on the street, less wary at work, worry less about our children’s futures, now that she is dead? She “was killed in an Israeli air strike on Oct. 23 which also took the lives of relatives. The status of her two children is unconfirmed,” according to the tribute to her on the We are Not Numbers website. Huda had not yet had a chance to contribute to the project which “tells the stories behind the numbers of Palestinians in the news and advocates for their human rights.” Now more than ever it’s vital to cherish the personhood of those, Palestinian, Israeli and others, who are being killed in this horrendous war, the Black Shabbat and the War on Gaza. “Every person has a name” goes the Hebrew song that is used on memorial days for soldiers and the Holocaust. Her name was Huda. Her colleagues describe Huda as ” a beacon of strength and kindness,” having “a way of lighting up any room with her infectious energy and her radiant smile.” I imagine myself back in my days of university teaching. Would I enjoy Huda being a student in my class? I think so, very much.

Maybe that’s not good enough though. In this time of turmoil and tension, perhaps some readers will insist that Huda’s “love of Palestine” and determination “to reveal to the world the stories and struggles of those living in the shadow of the Israeli occupation” mean she was a propagandist, an enemy of we Jews. She loved her country; is that wrong? Don’t you? Perhaps some readers will doubt the good standing of the organisations behind the project, Nonviolence International and the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor because they are too Palestinian. Maybe I should have picked a better example, whose innocence could not be challenged. Here, then, is Reevana al-Hussain, a one year-old also killed in an Israeli airstrike. Nothing else is written about her on the Instagram post, but I saw a news clip of a despairing father crying at a bomb site somewhere in Gaza that his one year old daughter had been killed. When did she have time to become Hamas, he lamented. When indeed.

But we are safer, we’re told, not because Huda and Reevana are dead, but because they were “collateral damage” in the targeting of Hamas terrorists, who use the Palestinians civilian population as human shields. So, are, Israeli and Diaspora Jews, safer because Ibrahim Biari, a target of some of the intense, deadly and destructive bombing in Jabalia, is dead? He is said to have been responsible for some of the horrific Hamas attacks on October 7th, so he won’t be doing any more of that. But how many more Ibrahim’s will there be? Weren’t we told that we’d be safer after Hamas founder and leader Sheikh Yassin was assassinated in 2004, followed by his deputy Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi later the same year? And weren’t we told we would be safer after Yahya Ayyash, the Hamas “Engineer” who made the bombs for a series of horrendous suicide attacks from 1993-95, sabotaging the Oslo peace process, was killed in January 1996? No, his death was followed by four suicide bombings that killed seventy-eight Israelis in February and March 1996, undermining the authority of Shimon Peres as the successor of Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister at the time of Oslo who was assassinated by a Jewish religious terrorist in November 1995. Netanyahu was elected in stead of Peres. There has not been another Rabin, another Israeli leader with the trust of enough Israelis to lead the country to peace.

None of the killing has made us safer, not in Israel-Palestine or in the Diaspora. Antisemitism always spikes when one of these wars happen, and this time even more so. Here in the UK, the official representative body of the organised community, the Board of Deputies, put out A GUIDE FOR JEWISH EMPLOYEES NAVIGATING WORKPLACE ISSUES ARISING FROM THE WAR IN ISRAEL. There’s some sound advice about addressing harassment, victimisation and discrimination. But when it comes to “How to handle difficult conversations” the guide offers Israeli hasbara talking points. The key point should be that Jews in the UK should not be held responsible for the actions of the Israeli government and military, just as Muslims in the UK are not responsible for the actions of Hamas. One is antisemitism, the other is Islamophobia. Instead, the Board of Deputies encourages UK Jews to make our safety dependent on defending what are almost certainly indefensible war crimes, if not genocide.

It cuts both ways, of course. Are Palestinians in Gaza, in the West Bank, in pre-1967 Israel, in the diaspora, safer because Hayim Katsman is dead? Hayim was an academic, someone I would have liked to meet as a colleague, who had also been active with Machsom Watch, given testimony to Breaking the Silence and (as I have done occasionally) spent time accompanying Palestinian farmers in the South Hebron Hills to protect them from settler and soldier harassment. No, Palestinians are not safer. Palestinians citizens of Israel are no closer to equality; Palestinians in the Occupied Territories are no longer closer to freedom, to independence; and Diaspora Palestinians are no closer to justice, to fulfilling their right of return.

Photo:  Hannah Wacholder Katsman

No, none of us are safer because of all the killing. And none of us will be safer if more Hudas, Reevanas and Hayims are killed, with whatever justifications. There must be an immediate ceasefire. It’s being called for in Israel, especially by those for whom freeing the hostages is the highest priority. It’s being called for by progressive Jews in the Diaspora, such as the anti-occupation group in which I’m active, Na’amod. The call for a ceasefire is also heard at the many solidarity protests with Palestinians. Because a ceasefire is what is needed now, I joined one of those protests in my home city, Nottingham. It was not always comfortable for me, and I did not join in all the chants. But what is my discomfort when the alternative to a ceasefire is more Hudas, Reevanas and Hayims?

Protestors against the war in Tel Aviv, October 28 2023. Photo: Oren Ziv

If we bomb them, do they not bleed?

A dear friend from my first long spell in Israel-Palestine in 1978-79, now a rabbi in the US, wrote on her Facebook page a few days ago that Rabbi Hillel’s famous saying had been in her head for days, but she no longer knows who she is. I’m not quite sure what she meant, but in the past week I’ve understood something more of Hillel’s brilliant encapsulation of ethics. I learned how easy it is to lose yourself in your own pain, individual and collective. I learned how difficult but necessary it is to sustain that productive tension between caring for oneself and for others. I struggled to hold on to my moral compass, sometimes losing sight of myself in the swirls of emotional and moral outrage.

The brutal of atrocity of Hamas’s attack on Israeli civilians shocked me by its scale and suddenness. It provoked profound anger in me that I understood grew from an equally deep fear. I was able to avert a visceral urge for vengeance only by contemplating the unbearable cost that exacting revenge would take from my own flesh and blood, the potential perpetrators of revenge. For the first time in decades, I went to a synagogue service not for a special occasion, just to spend time with other Jews and have a chance to talk about what we’re going through. The community was shrouded in sadness, grief and fear, appalled by the massacres, grieving for the dead, in anguish about the hostages, among whom is a friend of the rabbi’s daughter. They were worried about antisemitism, needy for each others’ company and support. The rabbi did a wonderful job of reminding us that the shabbat eve service is a beautiful spiritual exercise to calm the soul (or psyche) and focus on the simple joys of togetherness, the sweetness of the challah bread and kiddush wine. The beauty of Creation and being alive in it as a community.

During the week I had posted to Facebook that.

“I couldn’t bring myself to join in the protest organised by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, even though it has never been more urgent and vital to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians … For the most part, I can join in the chant of ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ as a call to end occupation and apartheid, for Palestinian independence. But I cannot shout it when I think that even one other person also shouting it sees a way to freedom through the brutal massacre of civilians.”

A friend from Extinction Rebellion reassured me that there had been no hint of glorifying Hamas at the Nottingham event (where I live). I had heard from colleagues in Na’amod, the Jewish anti-Occupation movement which I’m active in, that they’d been shocked to hear support for Hamas’ “acts of resistance” from people they assumed to be allies. I was feeling too fragile to face that. In the wake of the mass killings by Hamas I sank into the grief and pain of my community, relatively inured to the pain of others.

The pain of others, of Palestinians in Gaza and the other Occupied Territories, was all to obvious. Every hour the violence takes on the more familiar pattern of previous Israeli wars on Gaza. 2008-9, 2012 (which I experienced up close), 2014, 2021, but on a bigger scale. In the news cycle, pictures flow of bomb explosions, rocket trails, the rubble of destroyed homes being excavated by hand in the search for survivors and bodies to bury. Some of the pictures, those from al-Ahli Hospital blast, are too horrendous to watch closely. The usual mutual recriminations fly, making no difference to the deaths and injuries suffered. As I write the death toll in Gaza is above 4,000 including 1,756 children and 967 women, surely an atrocity in itself. The intensification of the blockade by Israel as the bombing continues further worsens the already desperate humanitarian conditions.

True, unlike in the past episodes the pictures from the Israeli side are different, a train of funerals, distraught families of hostages, harrowing accounts by survivors of the Hamas attacks. I am still “for myself,” more easily moved by video of an Israeli family in mourning than a Palestinian one. Among the many news articles I read over the week one that most moved me was by Amir Tibon who took part in the meeting between Joe Biden and survivors from the kibbutzim and towns around Gaza, not as a journalist but as a resident. Biden both literally and metaphorically gave the survivors a hug. He had felt their pain and connected to it by sharing the pain of his own bereavement. He was for himself, but also for others, for us, Jews and Israelis. We are not alone when the President of the USA gives us a hug. Of course, he gave Israel much more than that, notably the material means to bombard the same Palestinian civilians for whom he also expressed sympathy, as if one hand did not know what the other is doing.

President Biden hugging Rachel Edri. Photo: Brendan Smialowski – AFP.

When we are for ourselves we need others to acknowledge our pain. We need others, like Joe Biden, as well as others in our own community. When we call out “Feel our pain!” we need someone other to hear us. We want them to acknowledge that this Jewish suffering feels to us like all the other Jewish suffering. But the demonstration of sharing one’s pain with others in order to validate and acknowledge their pain works both ways. The very basis of ethics is this relationship with an other. At first, it feels as if acknowledging the pain of others somehow undermines your own pain. But the cost of having your own pain acknowledged is to acknowledge the pain of others.

What and who am I if I am not also moved by a Palestinian woman telling an interviewer that 16 members of her family across three generations were killed when the family home was bombed? Then multiply that family’s loss by about 260. Is that not also an atrocity that cannot be justified by Hamas’ atrocity? Another news report that also moved me last week, but to anger, was about one of those regular acts of brutality to Palestinians in Wadi al-Sik in the West Bank by Israeli soldier-settlers that approached the cruelty of Abu Ghraib. While the incident is overshadowed by the inhumanity of Hamas’ acts, are we that sure we did not also commit atrocities on Palestinians not so long ago, not only at Deir Yassin but also Saliha, Lydda, Abu Shusha, Al-Dawayima, Tantura and elsewhere? Did we ever condemn those massacres at the time of the Nakba the way Palestinians are told by TV interviewers they must condemn what Hamas did? If Hamas terror triggers our trauma of the Holocaust, can we not understand that ordering Palestinians to leave the north of Gaza triggers their trauma of the Nakba? If our pain is acknowledged by others do we not also see how others see us and the pain we have caused them?

What comes to my mind is the famous scene in Avanti Popolo, Rafi Bukai’s 1986 film set at the end of the 1967 war, in which Israeli-Palestinian actor Salim Dau plays an Egyptian soldier, Khaled, who is also an actor. He and another Egyptian soldier are found wandering unarmed and waterless in the Sinai desert by some Israeli soldiers after the cease fire. Dau performs Shylock’s speech from the otherwise antisemitic play by Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice in English, 51 minutes into the film.

I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs,
dimensions, senses, affections, passions; fed with
the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject
to the same diseases, heal’d by the same means,
warm’d and cool’d by the same winter and summer
as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us,
do we not die?

The Israelis give them water and reluctantly allow them to tag along. In the subsequent scene the Israeli and Egyptian soldiers march and sing along to the Italian socialist anthem Avanti Popolo which is playing on a transistor radio. The film ends badly for the Israeli soldiers who sneak away from the Egyptians and walk into a minefield and both Egyptians who are shot in the ensuing melee on the banks of the Suez Canal. But there is a moment of shared humanity, mixed up roles as the Palestinian as Jew (playing an Egyptian) beseeches the Israelis to satisfy a basic need, to acknowledge the shared vulnerability of human bodies in a harsh natural and political environment. Shylock’s speech is about seeking revenge for the wrong done to him, just as a Christian would, but Dau stops before that turn. So should we.

Perhaps the hardest bit is not that, acknowledging the pain of others, some of which we are responsible for both then and now, but that we have to take that step now. As Noam Shuster, writing “for those who have the capacity to mourn for two peoples” put it:

“Both peoples are retreating inward right now, and it is extremely difficult for those of us who are trying to hold the pain of everybody grieving. Our mental, emotional, and political space is shrinking all at once.”

I can certainly understand that it is too soon for many to acknowledge the pain of others as the same pain they are feeling. I am far from the place where the grief is being felt directly and have not been bereaved or had anyone I know abducted. So, don’t listen to me, listen to Neta Heiman from Women Wage Peace whose mother Ditza was abducted by Hamas from kibbutz Nir Oz who calls to the Israeli government: “Do not destroy the Gaza strip; that won’t help anyone and will only bring an even more ferocious round of violence the next time.” Listen to Noy Katzman, who at the funeral of their peace-activist brother Hayim, murdered by Hamas, proclaimed: “Do not use our death and our pain to bring the death and pain of other people and other families.” Listen to Ziv Stahl who was visiting her family on kibbutz Kfar Azza on that awful morning who says:

I have no need of revenge, nothing will return those who are gone …all the military might on earth will not provide defense and security. A political solution is the only pragmatic thing that is possible – we are obligated to try, and we must begin this work today.

What is needed now is to acknowledge the immense pain and loss that has been suffered by Palestinians as well as Israelis. What is needed know is to acknowledge that Palestinians bleed as do Jews when pricked by bullets and bombs. What is needed now is a ceasefire, release of the hostages and massive humanitarian aid. Because if not now, when?