As a child I loved to watch as the Hanukkah candles burned down, guessing which would be the last one to give up its flame. Not having had any of my own children, I remain that child. This year the extinction of the last candles on the eighth evening of Hanukkah seemed especially poignant. The light gone, the darkness smothering all hope. More than 20,000 Palestinians and Israelis have been killed since October 7th, mostly civilians. Who knows how many more Palestinians lie under the rubble. There are still about 130 Israeli hostages somewhere in Gaza, imperilled by the bombardments and assaults of the military forces that are supposed to defend them as well as by their captors. More then 3,000 Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza have been imprisoned by Israel since October 7th, subject to military courts, administrative detention and abusive and lethal conditions. The injured in Gaza are denied the medical resources for their recovery by an unrelenting invading army. Countless others, as many as 80% of the population, are homeless, the descendants of refugees displaced from their homes, finding no shelter in tents on flooded ground, increasingly vulnerable to hunger and disease. The returned hostages confront their trauma. There is so much trauma, so many bereaved, so many maimed, so much ruin. So little hope.
A boy lights a Hanukkah candle as relatives and friends of hostages held in the Gaza Strip by Hamas call for their release, on the first night of Hanukkah, in the Hostages Square at the Museum of Art in Tel Aviv, December 7, 2023. (AP/Ariel Schalit)
By chance, it was the candle to the furthest on the left that obstinately kept burning the longest. It is the obstinacy of the Left that gives me some hope. I do not mean the ideological Left of the UK, where I live, the adherents of various forms of political Marxism. The most influential of those, the Socialist Worker’s Party, issued a statement including this clause:
Too many on the liberal and reformist left have been quick follow their governments in condemning Hamas and affirming Israel’s right to self-defence. The flood of media atrocity stories has obscured what actually happened on 7 October. But when oppressor and oppressed clash there can be no neutrality or equivalence. We support the right of self-determination of the Palestinian people and their right to wage armed struggle against the Israeli settler colonial state.
Hamas atrocities, according to the SWP, are legitimate anti-colonial armed struggle and its Islamist ideology somehow enables the SWP’s goal of of a secular, democratic state in all of Israel and the Occupied Territories. I’m happy to be liberal and reformist if that’s the cost of remaining ethical. But the SWP sound moderate in comparison to the Revolutionary Communist Group whose statement on the horrors of October 7th begins with:
Early on the morning of 7 October an audacious and unprecedented military action by Palestinian Resistance forces, Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, was launched from Gaza into the occupied territory of the Israeli state. The Revolutionary Communist Group (RCG) and our Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! (FRFI) Supporter Groups extend our unconditional support to the Palestinians in their struggle to liberate themselves from illegal occupation by any means necessary.2
By any means necessary on this account includes rape and torture as well as murder and hostage taking of civilians. Unable to grasp that even Marxist dialectics cannot make two wrongs a right, this branch of the ideological Left sees a valid path to Palestinian liberation that, contrary to Palestinian journalist Rajaa Natour‘s brave statement, “include[s] a speeding jeep in the streets of Gaza with a half-naked Jewish woman strapped to its front.”
I am also not speaking of the less ideological left in the UK, the progressive left who have been moved by the horrific scenes of Israel’s assault on Gaza to join the massive demonstrations of solidarity with Palestine, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Protests of that size attract people and organisations of a broad range of opinions, including the ideological Left. It would be hard to disagree with the PSC’s announcement before their first major protest on October 14th that:
Every humanitarian will be appalled and horrified, as we are, at the scenes we are witnessing of a severe escalation of violence since October 7th… International law makes it clear that the deliberate killing of civilians, hostage-taking and collective punishment are war crimes. Such crimes must be condemned no matter who perpetrates them.3
Yet, less than a week after October 7th, the PSC was unable to name some of the perpetrators of those crimes as Palestinians, or some of the victims as Israelis. The day after the PSC’s first march, in my home town as well as London, I wrote on my Facebook page :
Yesterday I couldn’t bring myself to join in the protest organised by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, even though it has never been more urgent and vital to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians. … For the most part, I can join in the chant of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as a call to end occupation and apartheid, for Palestinian independence. But I cannot shout it when I think that even one other person also shouting it sees a way to freedom through the brutal massacre of civilians.
There has been a left, anti- and non-Zionist Jewish bloc on the PSC rallies in London, including an organisation in which I’m still active, Na’amod. I went on one myself in Nottingham, on a week in which I felt the need to call for a ceasefire outweighed my desire to feel comfortable at a protest. I did not join in the chants of “From the River,” only the calls for a ceasefire. During the march I stayed close the drummers from the environmental group I’m active in, Extinction Rebellion, glad to be close to familiar people as I carried a sign with Na’amod’s logo, marking me out as Jewish and calling for the release of the hostages as well as a ceasefire.
Like many progressive organisations, Extinction Rebellion is pro-Palestinian by default. Its statement about the war claims that “The climate and ecological emergency has roots in centuries of colonial violence, exploitation and oppression – for which the UK bears a disproportionate share of responsibility.” In a over-simplification, Israel – often regarded as a colonial-settler state – becomes a root cause of the climate crisis. The statement about the war, which otherwise is generally thoughtful, ends with the phrase: “Only a just peace can secure a liveable future.”
But one sentence upset me because of a small omission. “We are horrified by the atrocities committed on October 7th, and the rapidly escalating violence and humanitarian crisis inflicted on the people of Gaza.” Why, I wondered, could it not say that atrocities had been committed against Israelis, against Jews? In a message to XR’s press team asking if the omission could be corrected, I wrote that “One of my reactions was ‘it doesn’t matter, don’t make trouble’ but that is a learned reaction from a long history of oppression, and it doesn’t help others to unlearn their oppressive behaviours to keep quiet about it.” I never got further than a response that it had taken a long time to arrive at this agreed statement after consultation with unnamed stakeholders, so the statement could not be changed. That was disappointing.
I was happier to join a silent vigil organised locally under the umbrella of UK Friends of Standing Together, held on November 19th, mourning all the victims and calling for a ceasefire and release of the hostages. I helped organise a second vigil by the group on December 10th, adapting a script from an earlier vigil held by Na’amod. On both occasions fellow activists from Nottingham XR were there too. The slogans on the banners were written to suit the Standing Together movement. These events felt very different to the marches and rallies organised by the ideological or progressive UK left, though one of the ideological left groups, Workers’ Liberty, has led this initiative. The vigils had something of the spirit of a Left that does give me hope, the Israeli Left that is also an Israeli-Palestinian Left.
Nottingham Peace Vigil 10th December 2023
It is something of a Hanukkah miracle the Israel’s Left is still burning obstinately as the country moves ever further to the Right. Since the start of the war, its opponents have faced a police and judicial crackdown, having to fight for the right to protest and hold political meetings. Protests during wartime have been a feature of Israeli politics since the disastrous 1982 Lebanon War, a disaster which look set to be repeated with Gaza. This Left has issued a Jewish-Arab peace declaration condemning the atrocities by both Hamas and Israeli forces. It repeats the truths we should all have learned long ago:
there is no military solution to this conflict, nor can there ever be one. The only way to stop the bloodshed is a political agreement that will guarantee security, justice and freedom for both nations. There are no winners in war. Only peace will bring security.
The obstinate flame, the obstinate Left, the obstinate hope.
Protestors for hostage release in Tel Aviv 15.12.2023. Photo: Tomer Appelbaum
Are we, Israeli and Diaspora Jews, safer now that Huda Al-Sosi is dead? Do we sleep more easily, feel more secure on the street, less wary at work, worry less about our children’s futures, now that she is dead? She “was killed in an Israeli air strike on Oct. 23 which also took the lives of relatives. The status of her two children is unconfirmed,” according to the tribute to her on the We are Not Numbers website. Huda had not yet had a chance to contribute to the project which “tells the stories behind the numbers of Palestinians in the news and advocates for their human rights.” Now more than ever it’s vital to cherish the personhood of those, Palestinian, Israeli and others, who are being killed in this horrendous war, the Black Shabbat and the War on Gaza. “Every person has a name” goes the Hebrew song that is used on memorial days for soldiers and the Holocaust. Her name was Huda. Her colleagues describe Huda as ” a beacon of strength and kindness,” having “a way of lighting up any room with her infectious energy and her radiant smile.” I imagine myself back in my days of university teaching. Would I enjoy Huda being a student in my class? I think so, very much.
Maybe that’s not good enough though. In this time of turmoil and tension, perhaps some readers will insist that Huda’s “love of Palestine” and determination “to reveal to the world the stories and struggles of those living in the shadow of the Israeli occupation” mean she was a propagandist, an enemy of we Jews. She loved her country; is that wrong? Don’t you? Perhaps some readers will doubt the good standing of the organisations behind the project, Nonviolence International and the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor because they are too Palestinian. Maybe I should have picked a better example, whose innocence could not be challenged. Here, then, is Reevana al-Hussain, a one year-old also killed in an Israeli airstrike. Nothing else is written about her on the Instagram post, but I saw a news clip of a despairing father crying at a bomb site somewhere in Gaza that his one year old daughter had been killed. When did she have time to become Hamas, he lamented. When indeed.
But we are safer, we’re told, not because Huda and Reevana are dead, but because they were “collateral damage” in the targeting of Hamas terrorists, who use the Palestinians civilian population as human shields. So, are, Israeli and Diaspora Jews, safer because Ibrahim Biari, a target of some of the intense, deadly and destructive bombing in Jabalia, is dead? He is said to have been responsible for some of the horrific Hamas attacks on October 7th, so he won’t be doing any more of that. But how many more Ibrahim’s will there be? Weren’t we told that we’d be safer after Hamas founder and leader Sheikh Yassin was assassinated in 2004, followed by his deputy Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi later the same year? And weren’t we told we would be safer after Yahya Ayyash, the Hamas “Engineer” who made the bombs for a series of horrendous suicide attacks from 1993-95, sabotaging the Oslo peace process, was killed in January 1996? No, his death was followed by four suicide bombings that killed seventy-eight Israelis in February and March 1996, undermining the authority of Shimon Peres as the successor of Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister at the time of Oslo who was assassinated by a Jewish religious terrorist in November 1995. Netanyahu was elected in stead of Peres. There has not been another Rabin, another Israeli leader with the trust of enough Israelis to lead the country to peace.
None of the killing has made us safer, not in Israel-Palestine or in the Diaspora. Antisemitism always spikes when one of these wars happen, and this time even more so. Here in the UK, the official representative body of the organised community, the Board of Deputies, put out A GUIDE FOR JEWISH EMPLOYEES NAVIGATING WORKPLACE ISSUES ARISING FROM THE WAR IN ISRAEL. There’s some sound advice about addressing harassment, victimisation and discrimination. But when it comes to “How to handle difficult conversations” the guide offers Israeli hasbara talking points. The key point should be that Jews in the UK should not be held responsible for the actions of the Israeli government and military, just as Muslims in the UK are not responsible for the actions of Hamas. One is antisemitism, the other is Islamophobia. Instead, the Board of Deputies encourages UK Jews to make our safety dependent on defending what are almost certainly indefensible war crimes, if not genocide.
It cuts both ways, of course. Are Palestinians in Gaza, in the West Bank, in pre-1967 Israel, in the diaspora, safer because Hayim Katsman is dead? Hayim was an academic, someone I would have liked to meet as a colleague, who had also been active withMachsom Watch, given testimony to Breaking the Silenceand (as I have done occasionally) spent time accompanying Palestinian farmers in the South Hebron Hills to protect them from settler and soldier harassment. No, Palestinians are not safer. Palestinians citizens of Israel are no closer to equality; Palestinians in the Occupied Territories are no longer closer to freedom, to independence; and Diaspora Palestinians are no closer to justice, to fulfilling their right of return.
Photo: Hannah Wacholder Katsman
No, none of us are safer because of all the killing. And none of us will be safer if more Hudas, Reevanas and Hayims are killed, with whatever justifications. There must be an immediate ceasefire. It’s being called for in Israel, especially by those for whom freeing the hostages is the highest priority. It’s being called for by progressive Jews in the Diaspora, such as the anti-occupation group in which I’m active, Na’amod. The call for a ceasefire is also heard at the many solidarity protests with Palestinians. Because a ceasefire is what is needed now, I joined one of those protests in my home city, Nottingham. It was not always comfortable for me, and I did not join in all the chants. But what is my discomfort when the alternative to a ceasefire is more Hudas, Reevanas and Hayims?
Protestors against the war in Tel Aviv, October 28 2023. Photo: Oren Ziv